Problem identification

In this project I will redesign The Irish Times mobile news app, incorporating principles of universal design to improve its usability for dyslexic users.

Dyslexia is a common neurological disability that negatively affects a person’s ability to read and comprehend text, affecting between 10-20% of the world’s population.

Secondary research will be carried out about accessibility and universal design principles with a specific focus on people with dyslexia. In addition, I will conduct research into the design of news apps to identify areas which can be improved to provide a better experience for dyslexic users. Popular reading tools will also be explored to understand how they design for accessibility.

Design guidelines for users with dyslexia

Embracing best practice for dyslexic readers has the advantage of making all written communication easier on the eye for everyone (British Dyslexia Association, 2018).

The W3C initiative categorises customisable text as an accessibility fundamental whose users include people with some forms of dyslexia and other cognitive and learning disabilities who need a particular presentation of text to read it. As every dyslexic reader will have their own preferences, highly customisable text and display will be essential in improving usability in the redesign.

Flexibility is a principle of universal design, and sites that offer a variety of options for locating specific content will be well designed for dyslexic users (Zusman, 2015). Search functionality is expected and is a vital cog in maximising flexibility.

Font recommendations are predominantly sans serif, with the exception of Times New Roman. There are also fonts designed specifically for dyslexia yet studies have concluded that they did not lead to a better or worse readability (Bigelow & Holmes, 2014).

Additionally, texts displayed on handheld devices (iPod, iPad) were read up to 27% faster by dyslexics when the text lines were very short in terms of number of characters, on the order of 16-18 characters per line, compared to 60 – 65 characters per line as recommended in traditional print book typography (Schneps, Thomson, Chen, Sonnert, & Pomplun, 2013)

There are a number of guidelines from the British Dyslexia Association (2018), and Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1, (2018), in summary:

  • Spacing
    • Characters = average letter width x 35%
    • Words = character spacing x 350%
    • Lines = word spacing x 150%
  • Text
    • Align text left, no justification
    • No columns
    • Line length max 60-70 characters
    • Bold should be used for emphasis
    • Avoid italics and underlining
    • Avoid uppercase and small caps
    • Short, simple sentences
    • Break up long text with section headings
  • Use single colour backgrounds behind text – no patterns or images
  • Use off-white & soft colour backgrounds – white can appear dazzling
  • Facilitate lower brightness and colour differences among text and background
  • Leave space around headings and between paragraphs
  • Use images to support text
  • Avoid abbreviations

Accessibility Evaluation

Following is a heuristic evaluation of a number of mobile news apps based on design guidelines for accessibility. Amongst them, the Irish Times app illustrates there are a number of issues violating these guidelines.

The New York Times

Positives

Clear navigation, simple and intuitive with only 3 large target areas
Large crisp images supporting text, and good visual hierarchy
Text size customisation with slider and preview

Negatives

Search field has no auto-suggestion leaving users with more cognitive load.

Sky News

Positives

Simple and intuitive home page with good navigation and clear lead story
Clean and clutter-free design with images assisting text
UI customisation options with dark mode and text size slider with preview

Negatives

No search feature
No personalisation options for different topics to reduce information bloat

BBC News

Positives

Clear, simple, clutter free layout
Images assisting text
Facility to customise topics, thus reducing clutter
Clear and simple intuitive search field with auto-suggestions

Negatives

No text or background customisation, referring instead to operating system’s settings

The Guardian

Positives

Clear navigation
Search field is intuitive with auto-suggestions

Negatives

Screens can be full of clutter
Text customisation limited to article copy only

AP News

Positives

Crisp, clean layout
Text customisation with various adjustment options
Clear navigation

Negatives

Search field has no auto-suggestions

Flipboard

Positives

Simple and clear search field with auto-suggest and auto-complete
Flexibility in the search provides multiple ways of completing task

Negatives

Poor contrast in headings
Type in background image difficult to read
Uppercase text violates accessibility guidelines

The Irish Times

Positives

Navigation is clear although there are 17 sections on a horizontal list
Basic text customisation allows for 3 size settings – but applies only to the article copy

Negatives

Text is difficult to read when the background is a pattern or image
No images to support text
Underlined text violates accessibility guidelines
No search feature and absence of personal topic customisation
Long documents should be broken up with regular section headings

How popular reading apps have designed for accessibility

iBooks

Several fonts
Background colours
Brightness adjustment
Text size options
Search in-text, Web or Wikipedia

Kindle

Several fonts
Background colours
Brightness adjustment
Text size options
Line spacing options
Dictionary meaning, Wikipedia and translation

Leave a comment